GAYASHODDIN NIYAJUDDIN SHAIKH v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
IA/2958/2026 · 2026-09-03
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6416 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6416 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
13 APEAL(ST)-16906-26.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL (ST) NO. 16906 OF 2026
Gayashoddin Niyajuddin Shaikh ..Appellant Versus The State of Maharashtra …Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2958 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 2959 OF 2026 Ms. Anima Mishra a/w Mr. Anuj Singh, Mr. Vinod Patil, Mr. Ritu Singh, for the Appellant/Applicant. Mr. D J Haldankar, APP for Respondent – State.
CORAM :
N. J. JAMADAR, J.
DATE : 03rd September 2026 P.C.: APPEAL(ST)/16906/2026
1. Heard.
2. Admit.
3. Call R & P. IA/2959/2026
4. Issue notice to the respondent, returnable on 24th September, 2026.
SAINATH, PA 1/2 SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Digitally signed by SAINATH SANJAY BODKHE Date: 2026.09.05 13:10:50 +0530
13 APEAL(ST)-16906-26.DOC
5. Mr. Haldankar, the learned APP, waives notice for respondent. IA/2958/2026
6. This is an application for condonation of delay of 102 days in filing the appeal against an order dated 09th March, 2026 passed by the learned Special Judge whereby the applicant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 20(b) (ii)(C) and 29 of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 10 years.
7. As the applicant has been in custody and for the reasons assigned in the application, the delay deserves to be condoned.
8. Hence, the following order :- : : O R D E R : : (i) The IA/2958/2026 stands allowed. (ii) The delay in preferring the appeal stands condoned.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.] SAINATH, PA 2/2