Sheik Nasir Hussain v. Stte Rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/1957/2026 · 2026-01-29
K Rajasekar
Transfer Petitionbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 64151 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 64151 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.1957 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 29.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE K. RAJASEKAR CRL OP No.1957 of 2026 Sheik Nasir Hussain ... Petitioner Vs State Rep by The Inspector of police, M-2, M.M. colony Police Station, Madhavaram, Chennai District (Crime No.442 of 2023) ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in Crime No.442 of 2023 on the file of the respondent police, pending trial in C.C.No.531 of 2024. For Petitioner(s) : Mr. A. S. Mohammed Manzoor For Respondent(s) : Mr. A. Gopinath
Government Advocate (Crl. Side)
ORDER The petitioner is an accused in C.C.No.531 of 2024 on the file of the Additional District Judicial Presiding Officer, Principal Special Court under E.C.Act, Chennai. The petitioner who was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 05.12.2023, for the offences punishable under Section 8(c), 20(b), (ii)(c), 25,29(1) of NDPS Act and Section 120 B of I.P.C on the file of the respondent police seeks bail,
2. This is a sixth bail petition filed by the petitioner and the earlier four bail petitions was dismissed by this Court. This Court while disposing 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1957 of 2026 the fifth bail petition of the petitioner on 03.12.2025 in Crl.O.P.No.29175 of 2025 has held as follows:
3. Considering the report and other relevant circumstances and taking into account the fact that the petitioner has been in custody for a considerable period, this Court deems it appropriate to direct the Trial Court to expedite the trial proceedings. The respondent police are also
directed to take necessary steps to serve summons on A1 in this case. Furthermore, the Superintendent of the Central Prison, Rajamahendravaram is directed to extent full cooperation to the Trial Court for securing the presence of the petitioner, either in person or through virtual mode for trial. Accordingly, the Trial Court is directed to initiate all necessary steps to begin trial and conclude the same as early as possible.
3. The above order was passed on 03.12.2025 and the petitioner has filed the present bail petition within a short span of time and without waiting for a reasonable period. Therefore, this Court is of the view that if the petitioner is released on bail it will affect the trial process. Hence, this Court is not inclined to entertain this petition. Accordingly, this criminal original petition stands dismissed. 29.01.2026 smn 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1957 of 2026 To
1. The Inspector of police, M-2, M.M. colony Police Station, Madhavaram, Chennai District
2. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.1957 of 2026 K. RAJASEKAR, J. smn Crl.O.P. No.1957 of 2026 29.01.2026 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis