Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6407 (RAJ)

B S MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN AND ORS

CRLMP/5614/2016 · 2026-03-28

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13140] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5614/2016 B.S. Meena S/o Sh. Sukhdev Singh Meena, R/o X-16, Patliputra, Ambabari, Jaipur- 302039, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner/Complainant Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through P.P. 2. Santosh Meena D/o Sh. K.l. Meena W/o Sh. Siddharth BS Meena, R/o Flat No. 250, 6Th Floor, Revenue Apartment, Khernagar, Bandra East, Presently R/o D-21, Bangla-74, T.t. Nagar, New Market Bhopal. 3. K.l. Meena S/o Sarwan Meena, R/o D-21, Bangla-74, T.T. Nagar, New Market Bhopal. 4. Kamla Meena W/o K.l. Meena, R/o D-21, Bangla-74, T.T. Nagar, New Market Bhopal. 5. Amit S/o K.L. Meena, R/o D-21, Bangla-74, T.T. Nagar, New Market Bhopal. 6. Ajeet S/o K.L. Meena, R/o D-21, Bangla-74, T.T. Nagar, New Market Bhopal. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Yatharth Agarwal for Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore-PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 28/03/2026 1. Counsel submits that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner-complainant has expired and his legal representa- tives have not contacted with him to file an application for their substitution, hence, under these circumstances, the present peti- tion be abated. [2026:RJ-JP:13140] (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5614/2016] 2. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the present petition is dismissed as abated. 3. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 4. However, the legal representatives of the petitioner would be at liberty to move an application for revival of this petition, in case, any cause of action/grievance still survives. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/35