APHC010198352019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3239] FRIDAY, THE 17th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE NO: 506/2019 Between: M/s. DEVA PRIYA CHILLIES TRADERS, REP.BY ITS PROPRIETOR SRI.G.APPA RAO, S/O SRI.SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, TAKKELLAPADU(PO), PEDAKAKANI MANDAL GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. V SAMBASIVA REDDY, CHAIRMAN, AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. MR N SRINIVASA RAO, ( DDM ON DEPUTATION) SEL.GRADE SECRETARY, AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE, GUNTUR. GUNTUR DISTRICT 3. SRI KURRA APPA RAO, CHAIRMAN AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT 4. SMT A CHANDRIKA, SELECTION GRADE SECRETARY ON DEPUTATION AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTEE GUNTUR GUNTUR DISTRICT. RR 3 AND 4 ARE IMPLEADED AS PER COURT ORDER DATED 01.05.2026, VIDE IA NO-1/2026 IN CC NO-506 OF 2019 ...CONTEMNOR(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K MADHAVA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. Gangisetty Rajeswara rao, Standing Counsel For Agricultural Marketing Committees 2. 3. B PRAKASAM (Sr SC FOR A M C ) 2 C.C. No.506 of 2019 KSR,J The Court made the following ORDER :- The petitioner had earlier filed Writ Petition No.3143 of 2019 seeking a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 5th respondent in not issuing Form 5-C and not receiving the same along with the prescribed licence fee under Rule 49(3) of the A.P. (Agricultural Produce and Livestock) Market Rules, 1969, while considering the petitioner's application under Rule 49(4) of the said Rules for grant of a commission agent licence, despite the common Resolution No.147, dated 18.09.2018. Upon receipt of notice in the said Writ Petition, the learned Standing Counsel for the Agricultural Market Committee submitted that the 5th respondent would comply with the provisions of Rules 49(3) and 49(4) of the Rules, as well as Bye-law No.20. Recording the said submission, this Court disposed of Writ Petition No.3143 of 2019 by order, dated 13.03.2019. Thereafter, the petitioner filed the present Contempt Case in the year 2019, alleging willful disobedience of the undertaking recorded by this Court in the aforesaid order. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents submit that the order of this Court has been duly complied with and that the Commission Agent Licence has been granted to the petitioner. A copy of the licence has also been produced before this Court. 3. In view of the above facts and circumstances and recording the above said submission, the present Contempt Case is closed. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____ K.SURESH REDDY, J Dt. 17.07.2026 SAB 3 C.C. No.506 of 2019 KSR,J 119 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.506 OF 2019 Dt. 17.07.2026 SAB