Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 64034 (MAD)

R.Subburam v. The Managing Director

WP/1137/2026 · 2026-01-27

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P. No.1137 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 27.01.2026 CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M. DHANDAPANI W.P. No.1137 of 2026 and WMP.No.1323 of 2026 R.Subburam … Petitioner Vs 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd, CMDA Tower II, 4th Floor, Gandhi-Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, chennai- 600 008. 2.The Deputy Collector/ District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd, No.59-A, Chennai Trunk Road, T.N.W.C.Complex, Villupuram- 605 602 … Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records connected with the proceedings issued in Na.Ka.No.RV/ 525/ 2025 dated 22.12.2025 passed by the 2nd Respondent and quash the same and consequently direct the respondents to be remain in the same office as Junior Assistant. For petitioner : Mr.S.Illamvaludhi p. 2 W.P. No.1137 of 2026 For respondents For R1 & R2 : Ms.V.S.Saranya ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the order dated 22.12.2025 passed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.RV/ 525/ 2025 and consequently to direct the respondents to be remain in the same office as Junior Assistant. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that there is personal dispute between two employees. The respondents made allegation as if the petitioner attacked the co-employee, thereby the present impugned order dated 22.12.2025 has been passed by directing the petitioner to approach the Managing Director for employment. Such order cannot be passed and even there is an allegation as against the petitioner, it has to be dealt with only by initiating disciplinary proceedings. Without initiating disciplinary proceedings, discharging the petitioner from employment is not acceptable one. On this sole ground, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents fairly submitted that the respondents decided to withdraw the impugned order. Accordingly, the p. 3 W.P. No.1137 of 2026 writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the respondents to initiate disciplinary proceedings in the manner known to law. 4. Recording the said submission, the impugned order is set aside with liberty granted to the respondents to initiate fresh proceedings in the manner known to law. Accordingly, this writ petition is disposed of. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. 27.01.2026 Index :Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order Neutral Citation : Yes/No lok p. 4 W.P. No.1137 of 2026 M. DHANDAPANI, J. lok To 1.The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd, CMDA Tower II, 4th Floor, Gandhi-Irwin Bridge Road, Egmore, chennai- 600 008. 2.The Deputy Collector/ District Manager, Tamil Nadu State Marketing corporation Ltd, No.59-A, Chennai Trunk Road, T.N.W.C.Complex, Villupuram- 605 602 W.P. No.1137 of 2026 27.01.2026