CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION v. SHRI R.L. EZONG AND 2 ORS
I.A.(Crl.)/8/2026 · 2026-02-05
Yarenjungla Longkumer
Criminal Appealbody2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 64 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 64 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC020000482026 2026:GAU-NL:47
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/8/2026 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION GOVT. OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CBI, GOVT. OF INDIA, ECONOMIC OFFENCES BRANCH, NBCC SQUARE, 11TH FLOOR, ACTION AREA - III, AKANDAKESHARI MAIN ROAD, NEW TOWN, KOLKATA, 700135 VERSUS SHRI R.L. EZONG AND 2 ORS THE THEN SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY, GOVT OF NAGALAND.
2:SHRI K.M. ZIMIK THE THEN UNDER SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY GOVT. OF NAGALAND 3:SHRI NEIBA KHRONU S/O SHRI KHAFELO R/O HOUSE NO. 253 LERIE COLONY P.S. KOHIMA SOUTH KOHIMA NAGALAN Advocate for the Petitioner : BENDANGWABANG, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 2/3 Linked Case : CRAPL/3/2021 CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION GOVT. OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE S.P CBI EOB KOLKATTA VERSUS SHRI R. EZONG AND 2 ORS THE THEN SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY GOVT. OF NAGALAND 2:SHRI K. M ZIMIK THE THEN UNDER SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF VETERINARY AND ANIMAL HUSBANDRY
GOVT. OF NAGALAND 3:SHRI NEIBA KHRONU S/O SHRI KHAFELO
R/O HOUSE NO. 253 LERIE COLONY
P.S - KOHIMA SOUTH KOHIMA NAGALAND ------------ Advocate for : BENDANGWABANG Advocate for : PFOSEKHO PFOTTE (R-1) appearing for SHRI R. EZONG AND 2 ORS
Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER ORDER 06/02/2026 Heard learned counsel for the appellant/applicant, Mr. Bendangwabang.
2. By filing this present I.A. the applicant has prayed for restoration of the connected CRAPL/3/2021 on the ground that the Hon’ble Supreme Court vide order dated 07.01.2026 had restored the said criminal appeal. A copy of the order dated 07.01.2026 has been annexed by the applicant.
3. Learned counsel, Mr. W. Marhu for the respondent No. 3 and learned counsel, Mr. Medo Vero for the respondent No. 1 are present.
4. This Court vide order dated 03.02.2026 has already restored the CRAPL/3/2021 on the basis of the order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court dated 07.01.2026 and therefore, this application has become infructuous and is accordingly, disposed of as infructuous.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant