Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 8164 of 2026 Court No. - 81 HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed with a prayer to issue a direction to the court concerned to release the applicant on bail on the basis of a personal bond and two sureties in following cases:-
"(i). Case Crime No. 543 of 2021, under Sections 394, 411, 120-B, 216-A IPC, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra (ii) Case Crime No. 544 of 2021, under Sections 394, 411 IPC, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra (iii) Case Crime No. 560 of 2021, under Sections 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra (iv) Case Crime No. 564 of 2021, under Section 414 IPC, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra (v) Case Crime No. 565 of 2021, under Section 414 IPC, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra (vi) Case Crime No. 574 of 2021, under Section 3/25 of Arms Act, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vipin Chandra Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Karan Jaat .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s)
(vii) Case Crime No. 234 of 2022, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster Act, Police Station Sikandra, District Agra"
3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been languishing in jail since 1.5.2023. He is a very poor person and he cannot arrange two sureties in each case. The last bail order was passed in favour of the applicant on 30.1.2026 but he could not arrange two sureties in each case, therefore, he has been languishing in jail. 4. Learned counsel for the applicant placed reliance on the order of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.8914- 8915/2018 (Hani Nishad @ Mohammad Imran @ Vikky Vs. The State of UP), wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court disposed of the said case directing that the sureties in one of the case shall be good enough for sureties in all the cases. 5. Considering the submissions made at the bar and on perusal of the said judgment, it is directed that the two sureties of one case shall be permitted to act as sureties in all the aforesaid cases subject to furnishing of one personal bond.
The personal bond submitted by the applicant in one of the case shall be accepted in all the aforesaid cases. 6. The application is disposed of. March 18, 2026 Lalit Shukla NA528 No. 8164 of 2026 2 (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- LALIT KUMAR SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad