RUPESH KUMAR ALIAS RUPESH KUMAR SAO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2824/2026 · 2026-04-17
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6396 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6396 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:11159 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 2824 of 2026
------ Rupesh Kumar @ Rupesh Kumar Sao, aged about 26 years, son of Rajesh Sao @ Rajesh Saw, resident of New Madhukam, Mahua Toli, P.O. and P.S. –Sukhdeo Nagar, District –Ranchi (Jharkhand).
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sahil, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Subodh Kr. Dubey, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 17.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Budmu P.S. Case No.83 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under sections 115(2), 126(2), 324(4), 308(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Section 27 of the Arms Act and under Section 17 of the CLA Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner files a supplementary affidavit. Keep the same in the record. It is submitted by the
learned counsel for the petitioner that this is the third journey of the petitioner with the prayer for regular bail and earlier the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner was rejected vide order dated 09.06.2025 in B.A. No. 3835 of 2025 and vide order dated 12.12.2025 in B.A. No. 10001 of 2025. It is next submitted that the fresh ground is that in the meanwhile, the informant of the case, who has been examined as P.W.1, has not stated anything to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 12.01.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 15 of the bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant
or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the above-named petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Ranchi, in connection with Budmu P.S. Case No.83 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioner will co-operate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
17.04.2026
Sonu/