HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 4519/2026 Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Late Shri Hanuman Sahai Sharma, aged about 52 years, R/o Village Kanakpura, Post Panchyawala, Bajri Mandir Road, Police Station Karani Vihar, Jaipur. (At present confined in Central Jail Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Upendra Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Shriram Dhakad, PP Mr. Aditya Doda HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/03/2026 1. This bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.54/2026 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (West) for offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 189(2) & 324(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, (in short ‘BNS’) 2023. During the course of investigation, offences punishable under Sections 117(2) & 110 of the BNS, 2023 have also been added against the petitioner. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that none of the injuries sustained to the injured have been opined as dangerous to life. It is submitted that there is one grievous injury on the person of the injured and same is on (2 of 3) [CRLMB-4519/2026] the non-vital part of the body. It is submitted that there are no criminal criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that the petitioner is in custody since his date of arrest and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently opposes the submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner. 4. Counsel for the complainant submits that though there is grievous injury on the hand of the injured but another injury has been found on the head of the injured which shows the intention of the petitioner. 5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that injury on the head of the injured has been opined as simple in nature. 6. I have considered the contentions. 7. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, especially considering the material available before me in the form of case diary, as also considering the nature of injuries, so also the fact that there are no criminal antecedents against the petitioner and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 8. The bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner- Ramesh Chand Sharma S/o Late Shri (3 of 3) [CRLMB-4519/2026] Hanuman Sahai Sharma shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lakh only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 9. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J LALIT MOHAN /151