IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15383 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-264 Year-2016 Thana- SIRDALA District- Nawada ====================================================== Omprakash Yadav @ Tanik Yadav @ Omprakash @ Tanik S/O Late Kuldeep Yadav R/o Vill-mohra, Ps-atri, Dist-gayaji, Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bhola Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 26-02-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 379, 427, 436, 504, 506 and 387 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act and Sections 15, 18, 19 and 20 of U.A.P. Act. 3. As per written report, Vinod Kumar Yadav sustained injury at the place of occurrence who was proprietor of M/s. Vinod Kumar Yadav Construction Agency. He was constructing Railway Bridge. He informed the police that under the leadership of Praduman Sharma, extremists demanded levy earlier in lieu to construction of Railway Bridge and when he saw his inability, extremists burnt four vehicles, assaulted and Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15383 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 2/3 injured his staff Kailash Yadav and other labourers. He disclosed that in course of assault and burning, the extremists were calling each other with their names. He further disclosed the name of 63 accused persons including the petitioner. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that it is not palpable that accused persons while committing the offence will call each other with their names and it is also not palpable that one may remember the names of 63 persons. The nature of allegations is general and omnibus. It has further been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that similarly situated other co-accused person has already been granted bail by this Court vide Annexure- P/2 vide Cr. Misc. No. 9160 of 2026. Moreover, the petitioners are languishing in judicial custody since 12.12.2025. 5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of regular bail and submits that the petitioner is having criminal antecedent of five cases. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15383 of 2026(2) dt.26-02-2026 3/3 petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Sirdala P.S. Case No. 264 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nawada. Sudhanshu/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T