[2026:RJ-JP:11522] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3358/2026 Mukesh S/o Mohan Lal, aged about 30 years, R/o Deepty-Kheda, Police Station Rajnagar, Dist. Rajsamand, Rajasthan. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail, Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3359/2026 Laxman Lal S/o Shri Dhanraj, aged about 31 years, R/o Dowda, Police Station Amet, District Rajsamand, Rajasthan. (Presently Lodged In Central Jail- Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nitish Bagri Ms. Shretima Bagri For Respondent(s) : Ms. Manju Dave, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 18/03/2026 1. These instant misc. bail applications have been filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. by the petitioners Mukesh S/o Mohan Lal and Laxman Lal S/o Shri Dhanraj, aged about 30 years and 31 years respectively, who are behind the bars since 21.01.2026 in connection with the impugned FIR bearing No.33/2026 dated 20.01.2026 registered at Police Station Beawar City, District [2026:RJ-JP:11522] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3358/2026] Beawar for the offences punishable under Sections 115(2), 308(5), 127(2), 140(2) and 190 of B.N.S.. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners and the complainant have been engaged in regular business of sale and purchase of silver from last 4-5 years and no dispute ever arisen between them in the course of trade. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that even on the last occasion, the petitioners supplied the silver however, the complainant with the intention to commit fraud alleged that no silver had been delivered to them. On account of this, a dispute arose between the petitioners and the complainant, which subsequently took the colour of impugned FIR. However, the petitioners have also lodged an FIR against the complainant bearing No.52/2026 dated 08.03.2026, Police Station Rajnagar, District Rajsamand for the offences under Section 318(4) and 316(2) of B.N.S.. Learned counsel further submitted that the petitioners have no criminal antecedents of any nature and are engaged solely in the business of silver. In view thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners prayed that the petitioners be enlarged on bail. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application. 5. Be that as it may. 6. This Court, after considering the impugned FIR, the nature of the allegations, and the fact that the dispute between the parties arises out of their commercial relationship, is of the view that the trial is likely to take a sufficiently long time. The petitioners are behind the bars since 21.01.2026, and after considering the [2026:RJ-JP:11522] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3358/2026] overall facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners - Mukesh S/o Mohan Lal and Laxman Lal S/o Shri Dhanraj on bail. 7. Accordingly, these bail applications filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners Mukesh S/o Mohan Lal and Laxman Lal S/o Shri Dhanraj shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/-with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The petitioners are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 44-45 - RAVI KHANDELWAL