Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6388 (BOM)

JANKIDEVI GOPICHAND MITTAL v. MIKHDAD KURABANHUSSEIN KHAMBATI

WP/9443/2026 · 2026-09-02

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.9443 OF 2026 Smt. Jankidevi Gopichand Mittal .... Petitioner Vs. Mikhdad Kurabanhussein Khambati .... Respondent Mr. Sushil S. Upadhyay i/b Mr. Ashok Saraogi for Petitioner. Mr. Sachin Chavan for Respondent. CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 2nd September 2026 P.C. : 1. Learned counsel for the Respondent–Plaintiff states that the original documents relied upon by the Plaintiff are filed in the Court proceeding and that the Petitioner is at liberty to inspect the same, upon seeking permission of the Court. Learned counsel further submits that most of the documents referred to in the Application are not relied upon by the Plaintiff. 2. Considering the submissions, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that he would seek inspection of the documents relied upon by the Plaintiff and pursue the matter accordingly. 3. In view of the above, nothing further survives for consideration in the present Writ Petition. 1/2 23 WP 9443.26.doc Dusane BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Digitally signed by BHALCHANDRA GOPAL DUSANE Date: 2026.09.05 12:58:33 +0530 3. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed of. [ ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ] 2/2 23 WP 9443.26.doc Dusane