YOGENDRA @ GHODA S/O RAMSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5069/2026 · 2026-04-17
Ganesh Ram Meena
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6383 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6383 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:16306] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5069/2026 Yogendra @ Ghoda S/o Ramsingh, R/o Chiruni, Tehsil And Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Singh For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shree Ram Dhakad, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 17/04/2026
1. The petitioner has filed this anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. arising out of F.I.R. No.470/2025 registered with the Police Station, Mundawar, District Khairthal- Tijara, for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 324(2), 303(2) and 189(2) of B.N.S., 2023.
2. Heard.
3. Considered the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary.
4. As per the facts on record, the accused-petitioner, along with other persons, came driving a car and hit the scooter of the complainant, due to which the complainant fell down and sustained injuries.
[2026:RJ-JP:16306] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5069/2026]
5. The allegations against the petitioner are substantiated by the injury report and the photographs of the scooter available in the case diary. As per the rejection order passed by the Court Below, the petitioner is facing as many as eleven (11) other criminal cases.
6. Taking into consideration the allegations levelled against the present petitioner and so also the fact that he is facing other eleven criminal cases, this Court is not inclined to entertain the present anticipatory bail application.
7. The present anticipatory bail application is accordingly dismissed.
(GANESH RAM MEENA),J ARTI SHARMA /81