Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 638 (KAR)

RAMANJINAIAH v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/7934/2026 · 2026-03-23

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16267 WP No. 7934 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 7934 OF 2026 (LA-KIADB) BETWEEN: RAMANJINAIAH W/O. LATE BYLAPPA AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, R/AT NO.47, 11TH C CROSS, RAJAGOPAL NAGAR, PEENYA BENGALURU-560 058. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SAMPATH A.,ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPT. OF COMMERCE AND INDUSTRIES VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY GANDHINAGAR 1ST MAIN, BENGALURU-560 009. REP. BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 3. SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER-2 NO.39, SHANTHI GRUHA, BHARATH SCOUTS AND GUIDES BUILDING 4TH FLOOR, PALACE ROAD BENGALURU-560 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. A.S. HARISH., AGA FOR R1; Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16267 WP No. 7934 of 2026 SRI. VASANTH., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI, QUASHING THE GENERAL AWARD BEARING NO KIADB/BHUUSVAA-2/2425/21-22 DATED 30.08.2021 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.3 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN SO FAR AS PETITIONER CONCERNED AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondent No.1. Learned counsel Sri. Vasanth accepts notice for respondent Nos.2 and 3. The matter is taken up for disposal by consent. 2. The petitioner has sought for issuance of writ of certiorari to set aside the general award dated 30.08.2021 passed by Respondent No.3 vide Annexure-A insofar as the petitioner's lands are concerned and the petitioner has also sought for a direction to the respondents to consider the request of the petitioner for passing of consent award in terms of Section 29(2) of the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, 1966 (for short KIAD Act). - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16267 WP No. 7934 of 2026 3. The case of the petitioner is that he was willing for a consent award and accordingly, the question of passing of general award does not arise. 4. Learned counsel for the respondent–Karnataka Industrial Area Development Authority/Board (KIADB) submits that the petition itself could be disposed of while setting aside the general award insofar as the petitioner is concerned and the respondent-Special Land Acquisition Officer-2, would consider the request of the petitioner and pass a consent award as per law. 5. In light of the said stand, taking note of the directions passed in W.P.No.15026/2021, the petition is disposed of as follows: i) The petition is allowed. ii) The impugned general award dated 30.08.2021 passed by Respondent No.3 at Annexure-A insofar as the petitioner's land is concerned, is set aside. iii) Respondent No.3 is directed to consider the claim of the petitioner for passing of consent award and pass a consent award in terms of - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:16267 WP No. 7934 of 2026 Section 29(2) of the KIAD Act, within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. It is made clear that, in the event if there is any dispute with regard to entitlement and apportionment of the award amount, the general award at Annexure-A would stand revived. 7. Liberty is reserved to the Special Land Acquisition Officer, KIADB to withdraw the amount, if deposited before the Civil Court pursuant to the general award. 8. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of in terms of the above. SD/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE KTY List No.: 3 Sl No.: 10