Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6377 (GAU)

KAMRUL HAQUE MAZUMDER v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

I.A.(Crl.)/389/2026 · 2026-05-13

Parthivjyoti Saikia

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010072242026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/389/2026 KAMRUL HAQUE MAZUMDER S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI, MAZUMDER, R/O KASHIPUR PART 1, P.S. SILCHAR, DIST. CACHAR, ASSAM. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. S C BISWAS, Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, Linked Case : Bail Appln./4090/2025 KAMRUL HAQUE MAZUMDER S/O LATE SIRAJ ALI MAZUMDER R/O KASHIPUR PART 1 P.S. SILCHAR DIST. CACHAR ASSAM. VERSUS Page No.# 2/2 THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY PP ASSAM. ------------ Advocate for : MR. S C BISWAS Advocate for : PP ASSAM appearing for THE STATE OF ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 14.05.2026 Heard the learned counsel Mr. S C Biswas appearing for the applicant as well as Mr. B Sarma, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. The petitioner was directed to be released on bail of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount by order dated 05.01.2026 passed in Bail Appln./4090/2025. The petitioner, now, submits that he is unable to arrange two sureties of like amount. Therefore, he prays that he should be released on bail with one surety of like amount. 3. I have considered the submissions made by the learned counsels of both sides. 4. The aforesaid direction was passed after taking into consideration all the relevant facts. Therefore, at this stage, no modification is made in the said order. 5. With the aforesaid direction, the IA stands disposed of accordingly. JUDGE Comparing Assistant