( 2026:JHHC:10463 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr.M.P. No.1672 of 2025 ------ 1. Selga Steel Industrial Pvt. Ltd., through its Managing Director G. Gajendrian @ G. Gagendiran, S/o Govinda Chetty, aged about 67 years, R/o House No.54, Palaniappa Nagar, Salem, P.O. & P.S. & District-Salem (Tamil Nadu). 2. G. Gajendrian @ G. Gagendiran, S/o Govinda Chetty, aged about 67 years, R/o House No.54, Palaniappa Nagar, Salem, P.O. & P.S. & District-Salem (Tamil Nadu). … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Sanjit Mallick, S/o Late S.N. Mallik Resident of 15/I/C, Kalimati Road, P.O. and P.S.-Sakchi (Jamshepur), District-East Singhbhum. … Opposite Parties ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Sidhartha Roy, Advocate For the State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, Addl.P.P. For the OP 2 : Ms. Tanya Rai, Advocate ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-10-04-2026 Heard the parties. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition has been filed by the petitioners with the prayer for restoration of Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 to its original file which stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 21.03.2025. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 stood dismissed for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 21.03.2025 for depositing the payment of Rs.2,000/- by the petitioners with the Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority (JHALSA) within four weeks. It is next submitted that due to mistake on the part of the advocate’s clerk, the petitioners could not deposit the said amount within the stipulated time; which resulted in dismissal of the said Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 for non-compliance of peremptory order dated 21.03.2025. It is next submitted that non- compliance of peremptory order dated 21.03.2025 was neither deliberate nor intentional. It is also submitted that the petitioners have very good grounds to agitate in the said Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 and unless the same is restored to its original file, the petitioner will be highly prejudiced. Hence, it is submitted that the Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 be restored to its original file. Learned counsel appearing for the State has not raised any serious objection. Considering the aforesaid submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the facts of this case, Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 is directed to be restored to its original file at the same stage at which it was before its dismissal. Registry is directed to list Cr.M.P. No.3796 of 2018 before the concerned Bench after a week. This Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of accordingly. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 10/04/2026 Abhiraj/