SRI JITEN MALAKAR v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
WP(C)/274/2026 · 2026-05-14
Kaushik Goswami
Writ Petition (Civil)body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6371 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6371 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010290042025
undefined
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/274/2026 SRI JITEN MALAKAR S/O- LATE TARANI MALAKAR. R/O- HOUSE NO.51. BAMUNIMAIDAM KUSHAL NAGAR, P.O- BAMINUMAIDAM. DISTRICT- KAMRUP (M), (ASSAM). GUWAHATI- 781021 VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN, STATE BANK OF INDIA, CORPORATE CENTRE, MADAM CAMA MARG, MUMBAI, MAHARASTRA-700041 2:THE BRANCH MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA NEW GUWAHATI BRANCH BAMUNIMAIDAM GUWAHATI-781021.
3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE CHANDMARI POLICE STATION CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-781003 4:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE CYBER-CRIME BRANCH PANBAZAR GUWAHATI-78100 Advocate for the Petitioner : MD S HOQUE, MR. M DEKA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, N HASAN(R2),F. SHAHIN(R2),MR A HUSSAIN(R2),P SINGH(R2),MR. B K SEN(R2)
Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KAUSHIK GOSWAMI ORDER Date : 15.05.2026 Md. S. Hoque, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of the writ petition, the matter has become infructuous and accordingly, makes an endorsement to the said effect. Ms. M. Barman, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent and Mr. B. K. Sen, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 2 are present. In view of the aforesaid endorsement, the writ petition stands dismissed on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant