Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 63676 (MAD)

Settu v. The State Rep by

CRL OP/879/2026 · 2026-01-21

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 21-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 Settu Petitioner(s) Vs The State Rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Ariyoor P.S. Vellore, Crime No.182 of 2025. Respondent(s) PRAYER Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of B.N.S.S., to grant anticipatory bail to the Petitioner in Crime No.182 of 2025 in the event of arrest pending on the file of the Respondent police. For Petitioner(s): Mr.Sriraam MS For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest by the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(3) of Tamil Nadu Gaming and Police Laws Act, 1930 (Amendment 2021) and offences under Section 318(4) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.182 of 2025 seeks anticipatory bail. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner joining hands with other accused involved in gambling activities and cheated the defacto complainant. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that, the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that, apart from this case, petitioner has 12 previous cases similar in nature pending against him. Hence, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the submissions made by both counsel and considering the gravity of offence committed by the petitioner, and also considering the fact that there are 12 previous cases similar in nature pending against him and considering the fact https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 that at this stage, if he is released on bail, there is possibility of tampering the witnesses and hampering the investigation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 21-01-2026 gbi https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 To 1.The State Rep by The Sub Inspector of Police, Ariyoor P.S. Vellore, Crime No.182 of 2025 2.The Public Prosecutor. High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR J. gbi CRL OP No. 879 of 2026 21-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis