WP No. 1573 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23-01-2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE WP No. 1573 of 2026 P.Kalaivanan Petitioner(s) Vs 1. The commissioner of land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepuak, Chennai 5 2.The district Collector Thiruvallur District 3.the District Revenue officer Tiruvallur district 4.The Tahsildar tiruvallur Taluk and District Respondent(s) PRAYER Directing the 2nd respondent to pass an order of assignment under ex service man category, based on the proposal and recommendation made by the 3rd respondent in Na.ka. 62/3 / 2008 / En1 dated 02.07.2011 and further report in Na.Ka 6273 / 2008 / En-1 dated 28.01.213 in respect of the lands in survey No 222/4 measuring 0.52.0 Hectare, survey no 205/6 measuring 0.37.5 Hectare, survey no 205 /7, measuring 0.34.5 hectare and in all 1.24.0 hectares in Satharai Village, Thiruvallur Taluk and district and followed by petitioners representation dated 03.09.2025, within a time frame as may be fixed by this honble Court. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1573 of 2026 For Petitioner(s): Mr.R.Veeramani For Respondent(s): Mr.C.Jaya Prakash Govt Advocate ORDER This writ petition has been filed seeking for a direction to the second respondent to pass an assignment order in favour of the petitioner under ex-service men category, based on the proposal and recommendation made by the third respondent dated 02.07.2011 and a report dated 28.01.2013 for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, based on the petitioner’s representation dated 03.09.2025, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2.The petitioner claims that he is entitled to be granted an order of assignment under the ex-service men category for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition. The petitioner claims that a proposal and recommendation have already been made by the third respondent on 02.07.2011 for granting an order of assignment in favour of the petitioner under ex-service men category for the property, morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition and a report dated 28.01.2013 has also been submitted supporting the petitioner’s entitlement under the ex-service men category. Since the representation dated 03.09.2025 has not been considered till date, the petitioner has filed this writ petition. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1573 of 2026 3.Mr.C.Jayaprakash, learned Government Advocate, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4.No prejudice would be caused to the respondents if the petitioner’s representation, as stated supra is considered, on merits and in accordance with law, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 5.This Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the petitioner’s representation. 6.For the foregoing reasons, this writ petition is disposed of by directing the second respondent to pass final orders, on merits and in accordance with law on the petitioner’s representation dated 03.09.2025 seeking for an assignment order in his favour under the ex-service men category, based on the proposal and recommendation made by the third respondent dated 02.07.2011 and a report dated 28.01.2013 for the property morefully described in the prayer to this writ petition, within a period of 12 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs. 23-01-2026 vga https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1573 of 2026 To 1.The commissioner of land Administration Ezhilagam, Chepuak, Chennai 5 2.The district Collector Thiruvallur District 3.the District Revenue officer Tiruvallur district 4.The Tahsildar tiruvallur Taluk and District https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis WP No. 1573 of 2026 ABDUL QUDDHOSE J. vga WP No. 1573 of 2026 23-01-2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis