Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6366 (RAJ)

MURLI @ AJAYPAL S/O KAILASHCHAND v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLAS/577/2026 · 2026-03-28

Sameer Jain

Criminal Appealbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:13144] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Appeal (Sb) No. 577/2026 Murli @ Ajaypal S/o Kailashchand, R/o Gram Gaduwas, Police Station Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara. (At Present Confined In Sub Jail Kishangarhbas) ----Appellant Versus 1. The State of Rajasthan through the P.P. .......Non-Appellant/Respondent 2. Aman S/o Sewaram, R/o Gaduwash, Mundawar, District Khairthal-Tijara (Raj.) ----Complainant For Appellant(s) : Mr. Manjeet Kumar For State(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat For Complainant : Mr. Amitesh Rana HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 28/03/2026 1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 14A the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 on behalf of the appellant, who is in custody in connection with FIR No. 27/2026 Police Station Mundawar, Distict Khairthal-Tijara for the offences under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 3(5) of the IPC and Section 3(1) (r), 3(1)(s) & 3(2)(va) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-appellant has submitted that the appellant is the sole bread earned of his family, aged about 42 years. It is further submitted that the appellant is behind bars since 28.02.2026. It is next submitted that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter and that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the appellant. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel for the complainant have opposed the instant appeal and [2026:RJ-JP:13144] (2 of 2) [CRLAS-577/2026] have submitted that one of the injuries inflicted upon the victim is grievous in nature. 4. Having heard the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, considering the fact that the appellant is sole bread earner of his family, aged about 42 years; that the appellant is behind bars since 28.02.2026; that the charge-sheet has already been filed in the matter; that there are no criminal antecedents registered against the appellant, and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material available on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this Court is inclined to allow the present appeal of the accused- appellant and enlarge him on bail. 5. Accordingly, the instant appeal is allowed. The impugned order dated 07.03.2026 passed by the Special Judge, SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Cases, Khairthal-Tijara is quashed and set aside. It is ordered that the accused-appellant Murli @ Ajaypal S/o Kailashchand arrested in connection with aforesaid FIR, shall be released on bail, if not wanted in any other case, provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- and two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation to appear before that Court on all dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J JKP/9