HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32471 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sl. No. 11 out of 98) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Bipin, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Jyoti Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Sri V.K.S. Parmar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicants seek bail in Case Crime No. 40 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 191(3), 190, 61(2), 109, 130, 115(2), 352, 351(2), 324(2), 110, 117(2) of BNS and Section 7 of Criminal Law Amendment Act, Police Station - Dadri, District - Gautam Budha Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into consideration that similarly placed co-accused person, Sumit and Bhupendra, have already been enlarged on bail by coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 11.5.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 9081 of 2026 coupled with the fact that the applicants have no criminal history, this Court prima facie is of the view that the applicants have made out a case for bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. Let the applicants- Gaurav and Raju, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that they shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 6. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 14, 2026 Siddhant Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Bipin Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jyoti Kumar Singh (Krishan Pahal,J.) Gaurav And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad