Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6365 (KAR)

SRI LOKESHA, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/16127/2025 · 2026-03-02

M Nagaprasanna

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12693 CRL.P No. 16127 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 16127 OF 2025 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SRI LOKESHA, S/O HANUMATHIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS, R/AT DEVIHALLI GONI POST, TURUVEKERE TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572227 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. JAGADEESH H. T., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ARSIKERE TOWN POLICE STATION, ARSIKERE REPTD. BY - SPP HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA BANGALORE-01 2. M/S SHRIRAM TRANSPORT FINANCE COMPANY LIMITED, Digitally signed by SANJEEVINI J KARISHETTY Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12693 CRL.P No. 16127 of 2025 1ST FLOOR, ANANTHA COMPLEX, ABOVE AXIS BANK, B.H. ROAD, ARSIKERE TOWN, HASSAN DISTRICT - 573103 REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER AND GPA HOLDER, MR. KRISHNAMURTHY, S/O LAKKAIAH …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. B.N. JAGADEESHA, ADDL. SPP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 CR.PC (FILED U/S 528 BNNS) PRAYING TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.41/2021 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C AT ARSIKERE FOR THE OFFENCE PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 403, 406, 420 READ WITHS SECTION 34 OF IPC AND ALLOW THIS PETITION WITH COSTS THROUGHOUT. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12693 CRL.P No. 16127 of 2025 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA ORAL ORDER Learned Addl. SPP on verification of the records would submit that the charges have already been framed long before the filing of the present petition and the petition would not be entertainable at this juncture. 2. In the light of the charges being framed, the entertainment of the petition will run foul of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of MINAKSHI BALA V. SUDHIR KUMAR1. 3. Reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, as is available in law, the petition stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE SJK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 32 1 (1994) 4 SCC 142