Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:CGHC:17107-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPCR No. 198 of 2026 Gopal Krishan Sharma S/o Late - Prahlad Kumar Sharma Aged About 60 Years R/o- Msd 1/3 Savitri-Nagar, Colony Jindal Power Ltd. Tamnar, District-Raigarh (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Home Affairs, Mantralaya, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District-Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Superintendent Of Police/cyber Cell, Raigarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) 3 - The In-Charge, Cyber Cell, Raigarh, District-Raigarh (C.G.) 4 - South Indian Bank Ltd, Through Its Branch Manager, Bilaspur Branch, Ward No. 30 , Indrajit Complex, Old High Court, Main Road, District-Bilaspur (C.G.) 5 - South Indian Bank Ltd, Through Its Branch Manager, Attingal Branch, District- Thiruvananthapuram (Kerala). 6 - South Indian Bank Ltd, Through Its- Nodal Officer And Assistant General Manager, Dist-Thrissur (Kerala) ...Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Petitioner : Shri Anurag Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Priyank Rathi, GA --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board Per R
amesh Sinha, Chief Justice
15.04.2026 Heard Shri Anurag Verma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri Priyank Rathi, learned GA for the State. Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2026.04.16 11:10:05 +0530
Wpcr198 of 2026 2
1. Petitioner has filed this petition for the following reliefs:
“10.1 This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, directing Respondent No.4 to No.6 (South Indian Bank) to immediately release/refund the amount of Rs.6,11,198 to the Petitioner’s SBI Account as per the JMFC Raigarh order dated 31.07.2024. 10.2 This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to Direct Respondent No.2 & no.3 to initiate appropriate action against the concerned bank for willful disobedience of a judicial order. 10.3 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper under the facts and circumstances may also be provided to the Petitioner.”
2. After arguing for some time, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of present petition with liberty to take recourse to law. 3. In view of above, present petition stands dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law before the appropriate forum. 4. Certified copies of the annexures shall be returned to the learned counsel for the petitioner after retaining its attested true copies.
Sd/- Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice padma