Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6360 (ALL)

SMT. URMILA DEVI v. RAM NAIN AND 4 OTHERS

A227/12682/2026 · 2026-09-13

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12682 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This writ petition has been filed seeking direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bansgaon, Gorakhpur to decide the temporary injunction application 7-C filed in Suit No. 226 of 2025 within a time frame fixed by this Court. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that 7-C application filed by petitioner in Civil Suit No. 226 of 2025 is pending consideration and till date the same has not been decided by the court concerned. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon Civil Judge (Junior Division), Bansgaon, Gorakhpur to decide the temporary injunction application (7-C) filed in Suit No. 226 of 2025, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of one month from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 14, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manoj Kumar, Sonakshi Kashyap Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Smt. Urmila Devi .....Petitioner(s) Ram Nain And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad