Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010087042026 2026:GAU-AS:6368 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/2378/2026 GOPAL CHANDRA RAY C/O LATE RAHI DAS, R/O VILL HALDIBARI PART I, P/S-MERERCHAR, DIST- BONGAIGAON, ASSAM 2: CHETAN CHANDRA GHOSH SO LATE MANGAL CHANDRA GHOSH RO VILL 143 KIRTTANAPARA PART II PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 3: SUNIL GHOSH SO LATE RAKHAL GHOSH RO VILL 143 KIRTTANAPARA PART II PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 4: MIR IMRAN HASSAN SO ANOWAR HUSSAIN RO 160 TUPAKARCHAR PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 5: ABDUL BAREK SO LATE KHAYER UDDIN RO VILL A 160 TUPAKARCHAR PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 6: ACHAN ALI SO LATE FULCHAN ALI Page No.# 2/3 RO VILL KACHARIPETI PART III PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 7: KITAB ALI SHEIKH SO LATE KURABAN ALI RO VILL 161 HALADIBARI PART II PS MERERCHAR DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 8: INTAJ ALI SO LATE NUR BAKSA RO VILL KACHARIPATI PART III PS ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 9: JUL HUCHEIN SO LATE ABDUL HOCHEN RO VILL 161 HALADIBARI PART II PS MERERCHAR DIST BONGAIGAON ASSAM 10: SAMSUL HOQUE SO BHULU SHEIKH RO VILL 161 HALADIBARI PART II PS MERERCHAR DIST BONGAIGAON ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND OTHRS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY, TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, FOREST DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF ASSAM, DISPUR, GHY-06 2:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER BONGAIGAON ASSAM 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER BONGAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE ASSAM 4:THE CO DISTRICT COMMISSIONER Page No.# 3/3 ABHAYAPURI DIST BONGAIGAON ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MS M BORAH, A N HUSSAIN,MRS. B GOGOI Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FOREST, SC, REVENUE,GA, ASSAM BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KARDAK ETE ORDER Date : 08-05-2026 Mr. A. N. Hussain, learned counsel for the petitioners, upon realising that the matter pertains to protection of the environment, fairly submits that she may be permitted to withdraw the present writ petition, to avail the appropriate remedy/forum available under law. Mr. K. P. Pathak, learned Standing Counsel, Forest Department, appears for respondent No. 1 and Mr. J. Handique, learned State Counsel, appears for respondent Nos. 2, 3 & 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands closed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant