Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6355 (AP)

KATAMREDDY MALLIKHARJUNA REDDY, HYD & 2 OTRS., v. STATE OF AP., REP PP.,

CRLRC/196/2015 · 2026-07-26

Sunitha Gandham

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010646532015 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 196 OF 2015 Between: 1. KATAMREDDY MALLIKHARJUNA REDDY, HYD & 2 OTRS.,, R/o. Raghavendra Enclave, Manikonda, Hyderabad. 2. Katamreddy Bharathi, W/o.Mallikharjuna Reddy, R/o. Raghavendra Enclave, Manikonda, Hyderabad. 3. Yalam Venkureddy S/o.Venkata Subba Reddy, R/o. Kudithipalem Village, Indukurupeta Mandal, S.P.S.R.Nellore District. ...Petitioners AND 1. STATE OF AP REP PP, rept. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Hyderabad (A.P) ...Respondent Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto present this Crl.Rc. against the issuance of summons to the petitioners in CC No.558 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali, while taking the cognizance against the petitioners herein. IA NO: 1 OF 2015(CRLRCMP 312 OF 2015 2 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay of all further proceedings in CC No.558 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Kavali, pending the above revision case, and to pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioners: MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 3 THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.196 OF 2015 ORDER: Sri B.Teja, learned counsel, who is representing Sri Mahava Rao Nalluri, learned counsel for the revision petitioners, submitted that the matter is settled out of Court and sought permission to withdraw this revision. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, recording the statement of learned counsel for the revision petitioners, this Criminal Revision case is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ SUNITHA GANDHAM, J 27.07.2026 TM 4 THE HON’BLE SMT JUSTICE SUNITHA GANDHAM CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.196 OF 2015 27.07.2026 TM