Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2026:CGHC:16535
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 2993 of 2026 1 - Mohan Lal Patre S/o Bhagwati Prasad Patre Aged About 72 Years R/o Village Ameri, Akri, Tehsil Bilha, Dist. Bilaspur (C.G.)
... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Forest Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur (Cg) 2 - Chhattisgarh State Information Commission Through Chief Information Commissioner( Second Appellate Authority) Sector 19, North Block, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur (Cg) 3 - Chief Conservator Of Forest (First Appellate Authority) Bilaspur Circle, District- Bilaspur (Cg) 4 - Forest Division Officer Bilaspur Division, Bilaspur (Cg)
... Respondent(s) (Cause title is taken from CIS) For Petitioner : Ms. Laxmin Sahu with Ms. Pragya Pandey, Advocate For Respondent/State : Ms. Apurva Nigam, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2. : Ms. Aparajita Pandey, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Harshwardhan Agrawal, Advocate SB: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2026.04.16 12:11:01 +0530
2 10/04/2026
1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking following reliefs:-
“10.1. That,this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased set aside the impugned order dated 19.05.1993 (ANNEXURE P/1), in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to grant salary to petitioner till the age of superannuation with other consequential benefits and interest. 10.3 That, any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case including award of the costs of the petition may be given.”
2. This writ petition is filed against the order of termination dated
19.05.1993.
3. Considering the fact that this writ petition is filed challenging the order of termination after about more than 30 years, I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition on the ground of delay and latches.
4. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
Sd/- Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge Ravi Mandavi