2026:JHHC:10283 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (Civil) No. 292 of 2024 ----- 1. Pradip Kumar Mahato 2. Utpal Sutradhar 3. Sukhen Mandal 4. Durgadas Gorai 5. Nirmal Chandra Das 6. Md. Mantaj Ansari 7. Anil Kumar Mahato 8. Geeta Kumari 9. Uttam Kumar Mahato 10. Md. Parik Anwar Hussain 11. Ranjeet Kumar Das 12. Raju Mondal 13. Shyamal Kumar Maji 14. Bijay Prasad Keshri 15. Sukumar Majee 16. Shyama Pada Kumbhakar 17. Subal Chandra Rohidas .......... Petitioners -Versus- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Jadhav Vijaya Narayan Rao, Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro 3. Madhvi Mishra, Deputy Commissioner, Dhanbad 4. Naman Priyesh Lakra, Deputy Commissioner, Giridih 5. Ramesh Gholap, Deputy Commissioner, Chatra 6. Megha Bhardwaj, Deputy Commissioner, Koderma 7. Anjaneyulu Dodde, Deputy Commissioner, Dumka 8. Mrityunjay Kumar Baranwal, Deputy Commissioner, Pakur 9. Vishal Sagar, Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar 10. Hemant Sati, Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj 11. Kumud Sahay, Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara 12. Zeeshan Qamer, Deputy Commissioner, Godda 13. Chandan Kumar, Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh 14. Nancy Sahay, Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh .......... Opp. Parties ----- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR ----- For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Prashant Kr. Rai, AC to SC(L&C)-I ----- Order No.11 Date: 10.04.2026 1. The present contempt case has been filed for initiating contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for their 2026:JHHC:10283 2 wilful and deliberate disobedience of the order dated 11.12.2023 passed in W.P. (S) No. 1075 of 2022. 2. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the show cause affidavits filed on behalf of the opposite party Nos. 2 to 14, this Court is of the view that no case of contempt is made out against the said opposite parties. The contempt proceeding as against the opposite parties is hereby dropped. 3. The present contempt case stands disposed of. 4. The petitioners are, however, at liberty to take appropriate recourse as permissible under law for redressal of their subsisting grievance. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) 10.04.2026 Vikas/ Uploaded on 10.04.2026