- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12547 WP No. 16420 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO. 16420 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. MALLIKARJUNASWAMY S/O LATE BASAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, 2. SRI. DEVARAJU S/O LATE KALASWAMAPPA, AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, 3. SRI. MALLAPPA S/O LATE SHIVAMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 4. SRI. KALASWAMY S/O LATE SHIVAMALLAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, ALL ARE R/AT CHUNCHURAYANA HUNDI, JAYAPURA HOBLI, MYSURU TALUK, MYSURU DISTRICT – 570 006. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.N. BHAT., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP BY ITS SECRETARY TO Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12547 WP No. 16420 of 2023 THE REVENUE DEPARTMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MYSURU DISTRICT, MYSURU – 570 001. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MYSURU, MYSURU DISTRICT – 570 001. 4. THE TAHASILDAR MYSURU TALUK OFFICE, MYSURU DISTRICT – 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. NAVYA SHEKHAR, AGA) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R- 2 TO 3 TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION/ REPRESENTATION MADE BY THE PETITIONERS DTD 23.10.2018 AND 08.12.2022 VIDE ANNX-B AND C AND FURTHER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT TO MAKE ENTRY IN COMPUTERIZED KHAT IN THE NAME OF THE PETITIONER IN SY NO. 51 MEASURING 30 ACRES 33 GUNTAS OF KALAHALLI VILLAGE JAYAPURA HOBLI MYSURU TALUK AS PER THE SALE DEED DTD 18.10.1956 AS PER ANNX-A AND ALLOW THIS WP. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:12547 WP No. 16420 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER On 13.02.2026, the following order was passed: "Finally, two weeks time is granted to the petitioners for compliance of office objections. If the office objections are not complied with, list this matter for dismissal on 27.02.2026." 2. Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioners. 3. Office objections have not been complied with. 4. Consequently, the writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE rv List No.: 2 Sl No.: 5