- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8648 MFA No. 1078 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1078 OF 2021 (MV-I) BETWEEN: SYED SADIQ S/O AMJAD AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS, STUDENT MINOR BY GUARDIAN NEXT FRIEND REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER SMT. NASIMA BANU, W/O AMJAD AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS HOUSE HOLD WORK BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF JANATHA COLONY SRIRAMAPURA VILLAGE SRIRAMAPURA HOBLI HOSADURGA TALUK CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577 501. …APPELLANT Digitally signed by SHARADAVANI B Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8648 MFA No. 1078 of 2021 (BY SRI. MANJUNATH N.D, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR. K S R T C, DAVANAGERE DIVISION DAVANAGERE - 577 001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. S. NIRMALA, ADVOCATE) THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 08.12.2020 PASSED IN MVC NO. 1194/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND M.A.C.T, HOSADURGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:8648 MFA No. 1078 of 2021 ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on appellant's side on call. 2. Smt.S.Nirmala learned counsel for respondent appears through video conference. 3. There was no representation on appellant's side even on 13.01.2026 and 31.01.2026. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption for dismissal, yet there is no representation. These facts reveal that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. Hence, appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22