Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6345 (KAR)

SRI JAI PRAKASH NARAIN v. SMT MADHAVI NARAIN

MFA/6800/2024 · 2026-02-11

Jayant Banerji, T M Nadaf

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2026 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAYANT BANERJI AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE T.M.NADAF MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6800 OF 2024 BETWEEN SRI. JAI PRAKASH NARAIN S/O. LATE R.N.PRASAD, AGED 64 YEARS, NO.100, 5TH CROSS, GRUHALAKSHMI LAYOUT, BASAVESHWARANAGAR, BANGALORE. ……..Appellant s (Sri. K.G.Sadashivaiah and Sri.Yashwanth C.R, Advocates) AND 1. SMT. MADHAVI NARAIN W/O. SRI. JAI PRAKASH NARAIN, AGED 48 YEARS, GANGANAGAR EXTENSION, BANGALORE. 2. SRI. HARPREET SINGH DHESI S/O. SHIVACHARAN SINGH DHESI, AGED 55 YEARS, R/AT NO.461, 80 FT. ROAD, IDEAL HOMES TOWNSHIP, RAJARAJESHWARINAGAR, BANGALORE. …….. Respondents MFA.No.6800/2024 ------------------------- 2 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed U/S. 19(1) of Family Court Act, against the Judgment and Decree dated 03.11.2023 passed in O.S. No.157/2016 on the file of the V Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru rejecting the suit filed Under Order 7 Rule 11(a) and (d) of the CPC. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the appellant is permitted two weeks and no more time to remove the office objections. Failure to remove the office objections shall result in dismissal of the aforesaid appeal without any further reference to this Court. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dated.11.02.2026, not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By: BR R By: NR C By: STE