DHARMENDRA KUMAR RAGHAV v. STATE OF U.P THROUGH ITS SECRETARY HOME U.P AT LUCKNOW AND 3 OTHERS
BAIL/29761/2026 · 2026-09-10
Krishan Pahal
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6345 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 29761 of 2026
Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.55 out of 80 T.C.) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J.
1. List has been revised. Learned State Law Officer has informed that notice to the informant has been served on 29.8.2026.
2. Heard Sri Pushpendra Singh, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yogesh Mishra, learned State Law Officer for the State and perused the material placed on record.
3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.170 of 2026, under Sections 65(2), 155(2), 352, 351(2), 64(एफ), 64(एम) BNS and Sections 5एन/6, 5एल/6, 5एम/6 POCSO Act, Police Station Sikandrabad, District Bulandshahr, during the pendency of trial.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant has stated that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. The victim has been examined as PW-1 during trial and she has completely resiled from her earlier statements and have been cross-examined by the public prosecutor after declaring her hostile. There is no likelihood of conviction of the applicant in the present case.
5. Learned counsel for the applicant has further stated that there is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 21.2.2026 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Pushpendra Singh, Shahrukh Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Dharmendra Kumar Raghav .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Through Its Secretary Home U.P At Lucknow And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Learned State Law Officer has vehemently opposed the bail application but could not dispute the submissions made by the counsel for the applicant.
7. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by
learned counsel for the parties, the evidence on record, taking into
consideration the fact that the victim has turned hostile during trial, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.
8. Let the applicant- Dharmendra Kumar Raghav, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required.
9. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. September 11, 2026 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 29761 of 2026 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad