Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6340 (JHR)

ARVIND KUMAR MURMU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY

WPC/5783/2025 · 2026-04-16

Deepak Roshan

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:10919 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 5783 of 2025 …… Arvind Kumar Murmu, aged about 53 years, son of Simon Murmu, resident of Near Karam Tree, Village Jorar, Namkum, P.O. and P.S. Namkum, District- Ranchi, State Jharkhand, presently working as Superintending Engineer (In-charge), Drinking Water and Sanitation Zone, Deoghar. …. Petitioner(s) -VERSUS- 1. The State of Jharkhand through its Chief Secretary, Government of Jharkhand, having its office at Project Building, 1st Floor, P.O. and P.S. Dhurwa, District- Ranchi, Jharkhand. 2. The Secretary, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, having office at Project Building, P.O. and P.S Dhurwa District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 3. Engineer-in-Chief, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, having office at Nepal House, P.O. And P.S. Doranda, District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 4. Regional Chief Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, having office at Nepal House, P.O. And P.S. Doranda District Ranchi, Jharkhand. 5. Executive Engineer, Drinking Water and Sanitation Department, having office at Nepal House, P.O. and P.S.- Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand. …..Respondent (s) …… CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohan Mazumdar, Adv For the Respondent (s) : Mr. Ranjan Kumar, A.C to Sr. S.C.-I …… 04/17.04.2026 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdrawn this writ application in order to file a fresh representation before the concerned authority for considering of his case for promotion. 2. There is no objection on behalf of the respondents. 2026:JHHC:10919 2 3. Accordingly, the instant writ application stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed representation before the concerned respondent for redressal of his grievance within 15 days. If any such representation is filed by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated period, then the concerned respondent shall take a decision with regard to the grievance of the petitioner within a further period of four months. (Deepak Roshan, J) 17.04.2026 Amardeep/ Uploaded on 20.04.2026