Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6339 (AP)

SK RASOOL v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/21223/2025 · 2026-07-22

Nyapathy Vijay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders : Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010407232025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] THURSDAY, THE 23rd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 21223/2025 Between: 1. SK RASOOL, S/O S.SHAREEF, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC HELPER (NMR), O/O DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, C B (CAMPS AND BUILDINGS), SUB DIVISION NO.V, N.S.R.S PROJECT, NANDYAL DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT,SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY, FINANCE (HR.IV-FR LR) DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THEENGINEERINCHIEF, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, CURRENCY NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, N.T.R DISTRICT. 2 4. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT NANDYAL DISTRICT 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, N.S.R.S SRISAILAM PROJECT, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 6 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, CAMPS AND BUILDINGS DIVISION N.S.R.S SRISAILAM PROJECT, NANDYAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents herein in not extending the benefit of 62 years on par with regular dated 31-01-2022 and relieved the employees as per G.O.Ms.No.15 petitioner from service w.e.f 30-06-2025 on attaining age of superannuation of 60 years vide impugned Proceedings Lr.Nos.DEE/ C B/ SD-V/ 11M, Dt.30-06- 2025, as highly illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the law and set aside the same and consequentially this Honble court may pleased to declare that the petitioner is entitled to continue in service upto the age of 62 years with all consequential benefits by setting aside the impugned Proceedings Lr.Nos.DEE/CB/SD-V/11M, Dt.30-06-2025and may pass such other orders. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents herein to continue the petitioner in service as Helper (NMR) upto the age of 62 years by suspending the impugned Proceedings Lr.No’s.DEE/C&B/SD-V/ 11m, Dt.30-06-2025, with all consequential benefit spending disposal of the writ petition and pass such other orders. 3 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. EATHAKOTA VENKATA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES I 2. GP FOR SERVICES II The Court made the following: Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No 4 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.21223 of 2025 ORDER: 1. The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of Respondents in not extending the benefit of 62 years to the Petitioner on par with regular employees as per G.O.Ms.No.15, dated 31.01.2022 and relieved the Petitioner from service w.e.f. 30.06.2026 on attaining the age of 60 years, and to declare the same as illegal and arbitrary. 2. At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner died and requested to close the Writ Petition. 3. Recording the said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as abated. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. __________________ NYAPATHY VIJAY, J Date: 23.07.2026 IS 5 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.21223 of 2025 Date: 23.07.2026 IS