1 APHC010184862018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] MONDAY, THE 20th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 649/2018 Between: 1. P.SRINIVASULU REDDY, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 2. N. SUBRAMANYAN, S/O N. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 33 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 3. MS. K. RADHA RANI, D/O K. RAMAKRISHNUDU AGED 45 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 4. D. HUSSENAPPA, S/O D. PEDDA NAGA HUSSAINI AGED 31 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 5. MS. G. VEENA, D/O G. NAGESWARA RAO, AGED 31 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, 2 PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 6. C. KUMARA SWAMI REDDY, S/O C. MUNI REDDY, AGED 31 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATION ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 7. MS. V. SIVA SILPA, D/O V. SIVA MOHAN REDDY, AGED 33 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF METALLURGY AND MATERIAL TECHNOLOGY, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 8. MS. G. MADHAVI, D/O G. VEERA RAGHAVA REDDY, AGED 37 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY. PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 9. MS. GRACE JEMIMAH, D/O B. SURENDRANATH, AGED 27 YEARS, ACADEMIC CONSULTANT/TEACHING ASSISTANT/ ASSISTANT PROFESSOR, DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY, PRODDATUR, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. PROF DR K CHANDRAIAH, REGISTRAR YSR ENGINEERING COLLEGE OF YOGI VEMANA UNIVERSITY (YVU), PRODDUTUR, KADAPA DISTRICT 2. SRI ADITYA NATH DAS I A S, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HIGHER EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, AP 3. SRI MUDDADA RAVICHANDRA IAS, PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, FINANCE DEPARTMENT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 3 4. MR P K THAKUR, SECRETARY, UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, BAHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MARG, NEW DELHI - 110002 (CONTEMPT CASE AS AGAINST R2 TO R4 IS DISMISSED AS PER THE HONBLE COURT ORDER DTD.19.03.2018 IN CC NO.649/2018). ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to to punish the Respondents for contempt of court under Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for willfully not implementing and violating the orders of the Hon'ble High Court dated 05.01.2018 in IA No.1 of 2018 in WP No.1024 of 2018 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P V KRISHNAIAH Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. TENEPALLI NIRANJAN (SC FOR Y V UNIVERWSITY)) 2. GP FOR SERVICES I 3. KIRTHI TEJA KONDAVEETI The Court made the following: 4 ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for willful, wanton and deliberate disobedience in implementation of the order passed by this Court on 05.01.2018 in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.1024 of 2018. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submitted that in view of the order dated 20.07.2026 passed by this Court in W.P.No.1024 of 2018, no further orders are necessary and requested to close the contempt case. 3. Recording the same, contempt case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 20.07.2026 Gss