HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 31393 of 2026 Court No. - 69 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit has been filed explaining criminal history, the same is taken on record. 1A. Heard Sri Akash Pandey, learned advocate, holding the brief, appears for the accused applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present bail application has been moved by the applicant accused- Neelam to enlarge him on bail in Case Crime No. 114 of 2026, under Sections 126(2), 140(1), 115(2), 351(3) of BNS, P.S.- Barua Sagar, District- Jhansi during the pendency of trial. 3. It is the contention of learned counsel for accused applicant that the accused applicant has been falsely implicated in FIR dated 26.5.2026 lodged by the abductee Parsuram Raikawar with the allegation against four named persons including the present applicant, who is a lady. It is the contention of the FIR that on 25.5.2025 at about 02:00 pm the informant has been abducted by the accused applicant and her brother Sonu on a motorcycle. Later on, the motorcycle slipped and all the three suffered injuries. It is further contended that it is also disclosed in the FIR that at the time of slipping of motorcycle, the father of the informant was there. It is further contended that despite the alleged recovery of the abductee, the FIR is delayed and lodged in the intervening night of 25/26.5.2025. The injuries are simple in nature. There is a land dispute between the parties, which led to the lodging of the present FIR. It is further contended that in a duration of two days, two other FIRs have been lodged, which Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Jay Prakash Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shiv Kumar Singh Neelam .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) became criminal history in the present case. In one case, he is on bail and another case, he has been released on notice under Section 35(3) BNSS. The charge sheet has been submitted. The applicant is languishing in jail since 28.5.2026. He seeks enlargement of accused on bail. 4. Learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. have opposed the bail and submits that the accused applicant has abducted the informant on the motorcycle but somehow, he managed to escape. There is criminal history. As such, submits that the bail application should be rejected. 5. This Court has taken into consideration the rival submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 6. Considering the allegation against the accused applicant, the delayed FIR and the charge sheet has been submitted, the accused applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. 7. Hence, without touching merit of the case, the bail application is allowed. 8. The accused/applicant be released on bail in the aforesaid case on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of court concerned in view of observation made by the Supreme Court in its dictums of Girish Gandhi Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh [(2024) 10 SCC 674] and Policy Strategy for grant of bail in re [(2024)10SCC 685]. 9. The accused-applicant shall cooperate in judicial process for fair and speedy disposal. September 14, 2026 Krishna* BAIL No. 31393 of 2026 2 (Avnish Saxena,J.) Digitally signed by :- KRISHNA KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad