APHC010198792022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY, THE 21st DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 11591/2022 Between: 1. K.SHOBA RANI,, W/O K.MARUTHI, AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, OCC HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO. 2-772, MARUTHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. 2. K.MARUTI,, S/O RAMANJINEYULU, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO. 2-772,MARUTHI NAGAR, SOMANDEPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. 1STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE PLANNING OFFICER, ANANAPURAMU-HINDUPUR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (AHUDA) D.NO. 11/86, NEAR COLLECTOR BUNGLOW, ANANTAPUR,ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 3. THE VICE CHAIRPERSON, ANANTAPURAMU-HINDUPUR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NEAR COLLECTOR BUNGLOW,ANANTAPUR,ANANTAPUR DISTRICT. 4. THE PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, GRAM PANCHAYAT OFFICE,SOMANDEPALLY, ANANTAPURAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of mandamus Declaring the impugned order proceedings No. 106/2020/AHUDA, dated 14.03.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent is as illegal, arbitrary,Violation of principle of natural justice and violative of article 14,21, and 300-A of Constitution of Inida and contrary to the AP Metropolitan region and Urban development authorities Act,2016 and consequently set aside the same and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2022 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the existing structures in SY No. 52 in Somandapalli village in an extent of 572.48 Sq.mts by suspending the impugned orders no. 106/2020/AHUDA, dated 14.03.2022 passed by the 3rd respondent passed by the 3rd respondent, pending disposal of the main writ petition, and pa IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to grant leave to the petitioner/respondent No.4 to file the counter affidavit and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. R SUJAN KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KOMMASANI SRINIVASULA REDDY SC FOR URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITIES 2. GP FOR MUNCIPAL ADMN URBAN DEV 3. Mattegunta.Sudhir,Standing Counsel For Z.P.Ps,M.P.Ps,Gram Panchayats The Court made the following: ORDER:- Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.21.07.2026 SR