[2026:RJ-JP:11820] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 4th Interim Bail Application No. 2122/2026 P.L. Bhadkya @ Pappu S/o Gopal Lal, R/o Bhadkya, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli (Raj.). (The accused petitioner presently confined at District Jail, Karauli.) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through P.P. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Deepak Chouhan with Ms. Aanaya Gupta Mr. Harsh Joshi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. Mr. Veerendra Singh with Ms. Manisha Meena HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/03/2026 1. This misc. fourth interim bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the petitioner P.L. Bhadkya @ Pappu S/o Gopal Lal challeging the order dated 20.01.2026 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Karauli in connection with the FIR bearing No.131/2022 registered at Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 341 and 302 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the wife of the petitioner is suffering from a cyst in her right ovary and requires urgent medical surgery. He further submitted that the petitioner has no family members to take care of the wife. Learned counsel further submitted that the accused-petitioner has a minor [2026:RJ-JP:11820] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2122/2026] son, aged about 4 years. In view of the above, it is prayed that the petitioner may be enlarged on interim bail for a period of 30 days. 3. This Court has considered the facts stated in the bail application as well as the information provided by the learned Public Prosecutor in compliance of the order passed by Co-ordinate Bench dated 09.03.2026 regarding the family members of the petitioner and his wife. This Court noted that there are sufficient elder members in the family of the petitioner and his wife who can take proper care of her pre and post to the surgery. This Court further considered the criminal antecedents of the petitioner placed on record in complaince of the order dated 04.02.2026, which reveals that as many as 13 cases are pending against the accused-petitioner, out of which, he has been acquitted in only one case on the basis of compromise and rest of the cases are still pending. This Court further noted that one of the cases pertains to an incident that occurred within the jail premises. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the present case, this Court is not inclined to exercise its powers under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it not proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this fourth interim bail application is dismissed. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J 23 - RAVI KHANDELWAL