HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5617/2026 1. Amjad Khan S/o Rasiad Khan, aged about 22 Years, R/o Village Sahsan, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At present accused petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Ajruddin @ Ajru S/o Rujdar, aged about 19 Years, R/o Village Ahalwadi, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At present accused petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5618/2026 1. Mangal Singh S/o Kuldeep Singh, aged about 22 Years, R/ o Village Sahsan, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At present accused petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg). 2. Kamal Khan S/o Muhur Khan, aged about 42 Years, R/o Village Sahsan, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan) (At present accused petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous 2nd Bail Application No. 5619/2026 Altaf S/o Aashu, aged about 24 Years, R/o Kanchanner, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg (Rajasthan). (At present accused petitioner confined in Sub Jail Deeg). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent (2 of 4) [CRLMB-5617/2026] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP TANEJA Order 15/04/2026 1. The present second bail applications have been filed by the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No. 15/2026 registered at Police Station Jurhera, District Deeg for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(5), 303(2), 308(2), 313 & 61(2)(a) of BNS and Section(s) 66-D of IT Act. 2. The first bail applications of the accused-petitioners were dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh bail applications after filing of the charge-sheet. 3. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have been falsely implicated in the case and they have nothing to do with the alleged offences. He further submits that investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been filed and the accused-petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Learned counsel also submits that the petitioners have been in custody since 08.01.2026 and no custodial interrogation of the petitioners is required. He further submits conclusion of the trial will take considerably long time, so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners into custody, therefore, prays to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 4. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the bail applications and submits that the said offences involve (3 of 4) [CRLMB-5617/2026] serious cyber fraud activity. He further submits that though the petitioners have no criminal antecedents, however, several complaints have been registered against them: one against Ajruddin @ Ajru and three against Kamal Khan, on the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal. Hence, benefit of bail should not be granted to the petitioners. 5. In response thereof, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that all the complaints against the petitioners are false, moreover, in the complaints against Ajruddin @ Ajru and Kamal Khan, a meagre amount of Rs.38,299/- and Rs.25,499/-, respectively, is involved. 6. Taking into consideration the overall facts & circumstances of the case; the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the accused-petitioners, the fact that charge-sheet has been filed in the matter, petitioners have been in custody since long and trial will take considerably long time in its conclusion, thus, without commenting anything upon the merits / demerits of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 7. Therefore, these second bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are allowed and the accused-petitioners, namely (1) Amjad Khan S/o Rasiad Khan (2) Ajruddin @ Ajru S/o Rujdar (3) Mangal Singh S/o Kuldeep Singh (4) Kamal Khan S/o Muhur Khan (5) Altaf S/o Aashu, are ordered to be released on bail, provided, each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that the (4 of 4) [CRLMB-5617/2026] petitioners shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 8. The accused - petitioners are directed to mark their presence before the concerned Police Station in the 2nd week of every month till conclusion of trial. The SHO of the concerned Police Station shall forward petitioners' attendance report to the trial Court on the same day of each month. 9. In case of any breach of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to move an application against the petitioners for cancellation of bail before the concerned Court. 10. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned SHO for necessary compliance. (SANDEEP TANEJA),J AVINASH GULERIA /2-4