Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 63237 (MAD)

Pichamuthu v. State Represented by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/204/2026 · 2026-01-08

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Crl.O.P.No.204 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 08.01.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR Crl.O.P.No.204 of 2026 1. Pichamuthu 2. Ramesh @ Ramesh Kumar ... Petitioners Vs. State By, Represented by the The Inspector of Police, Ethappur Police Station, Salem District. Crime No.536 of 2025 ... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.536 of 2025 For Petitioners : Mr.T.M Ramalingam For Respondent : M/s.J.R.Archana Government Advocate (Crl. Side) https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.204 of 2026 O R D E R The petitioners herein apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 4(1)(B) of Tamil nadu Prohibition ( Amendment) Act 2024 in Crime No.536 of 2025 on the file of the respondent Police, seek anticipatory bail. 2. The allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners was involved in illegal possession of 345 brandy bottles each containing 180 ml for the purpose of selling. Hence, the case. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the petitioners are innocent persons and they have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioners are ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prayed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) reiterated the prosecution case and submitted that apart from this case, 1st petitioners has one previous case and the 2nd petitioner has no previous case. However, he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.204 of 2026 5. Considering the quantity of the liquor bottles involved in this case and if the petitioners are granted anticipatory bail, there is a likelihood that they would involve in similar offence, hence this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 08.01.2026 sma To 1.The Inspector of Police, Ethappur Police Station, Salem District. 2.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Crl.O.P.No.204 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR, J. sma Crl.O.P.No.204 of 2026 08.01.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis