Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6323 (KAR)

SRI REHAMAN KHAN v. AUTHORIZED OFFICER

WP/5403/2022 · 2026-03-04

Lalitha Kanneganti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13293 WP No. 5403 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI WRIT PETITION NO. 5403 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. REHAMAN KHAN S/O LATE GHOUSE KHAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 34/1, 4TH A CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, OLD GUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU -560 026 2. SMT. FARZANA W/O REHAMAN KHAN, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO 34/1, 4TH A CROSS, VINAYAKA NAGAR, OLD GUDDADAHALLI, MYSORE ROAD, BENGALURU- 560 026 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SARAVANAN G., ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by SUVARNA T Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13293 WP No. 5403 of 2022 AND: AUTHORIZED OFFICER THE MALLESWARAM CO- OPERATIVE BANK LTD., H.O.102, EAST PARK ROAD, 7TH CROSS, MALLESWARAM, BENGALURU- 560 003 …RESPONDENT (BY SRI.K.V.LOKESH, ADVOCATE) THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED POSSESSION NOTICE DATED: 26.10.2021 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT BANK VIDE ANNEXURE-A UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE SECRUTIZATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS AND ENFORCEMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST ACT. 2002 (ACT 54/2002) FOR ENFORCEMENT OF INTEREST IS EXCESSIVE, ILLEGAL AND UNSUSTAINABLE, AND SET ASIDE BY ISSUING THE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:13293 WP No. 5403 of 2022 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Bank submits that the entire amount is paid by the petitioner and the loan account is closed. Hence, nothing survives for consideration in this writ petition. 2. Recording the submissions of the learned counsel appearing for the respondent/Bank, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. i. All I.As. in this petition shall stand closed. SD/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE MEG List No.: 2 Sl No.: 25