Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6322 (ALL)

MADHUKAR CHAUHAN v. LAXMINA AND 2 OTHERS

A227/12701/2026 · 2026-09-13

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 12701 of 2026 Court No. - 9 HON'BLE ROHIT RANJAN AGARWAL, J. 1. This is defendant's petition. 2. The suit filed by plaintiff was decreed ex-parte against which a recall application under Order IX Rule 13 CPC has been filed and the sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the recall application. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the Recall Application No. 5 of 2024 in Original Suit No. 2301 of 2021, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. September 14, 2026 (V. S. SINGH) Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Santosh Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Respondent(s) : (Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.) Madhukar Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) Laxmina And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad