IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20776 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-7 Year-2026 Thana- Cyber P.S. District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== 1. Abhishek @ Abhishek Kumar @ Chunnu S/o Mahesh Prasad R/o Village - Chhabilathika, P.S - Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura 2. Sachin Kumar S/o Karyanand Prasad R/o Village - Fedali Bigha, P.S - Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura Maternal Address - R/o Village - Chhabilathika, P.S - Barbigha, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Upendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 2 08-04-2026 Heard the parties. 2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Sheikhpura Cyber P.S. Case No. 07 of 2026 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 318(2), 318(4), 319(2), 336(2), 336(3), 338 and 340(2) of the B.N.S. and section 61(2), 66(C) and 66(D) of I.T. Act, lodged on 03.02.2026 by the informant Mithilesh Kumar. 3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that upon secret information that accused persons are involved in the Cyber Crime under the name and logo of Dhani Fast Loans App while calling the innocents and in the name of various service charges duping them of money, raided the place Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20776 of 2026(2) dt.08-04-2026 2/2 and after rounding of those present there, picked up the actual accused involved in the case. It then came to the notice of the Police that this petitioner as also Sachin Kumar commit the Cyber Crime by sitting in the community hall of the village. This led to the F.I.R.. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submit that the Police intercepted and apprehended the accused, the petitioners are not among them. Further, only because those apprehended named them, got implicated. They have no criminal antecedent. 5. Learned APP on the other hand has taken this Court to learned Sessions Judge order to show that there is complete complicity of these two petitioners and they are the actual mastermind of the entire episode. 6. Taking into account the submissions of the parties as also the materials on record and the observations of the learned Sessions Judge while rejecting their anticipatory bail application, no relief can be extended to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected. vinayak/- (Rajiv Roy, J) U T