Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 632 (GAU)

MUNMUN TANTI ALIAS GOPAL AND ANR v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./106/2026 · 2026-02-04

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010002832026 2026:GAU-AS:1519 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./106/2026 MUNMUN TANTI ALIAS GOPAL AND ANR S/O SRI BADAL TANTI, R/O SRIMANTAPUR, GARHMUR, P.S. JORHAT, DIST. JORHAT, ASSAM. 2: RAMESH BASFOR S/O LATE MOINA BASFOR R/O SRIMANTAPUR P.S. JORHAT DIST. JORHAT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PP, ASSAM. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. U K BARMAN, MR. R KONWAR,MR D PEGU,MR H ALI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 05.02.2026 Heard Mr. D. Pegu, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. P. Page No.# 2/4 Borthakur, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 praying for bail to the petitioners in connection with Jorhat PS Case No. 618/2025 under Section 21(b)/29 of the NDPS Act. 3. The brief of the case is that on 06.12.2025 at 07.55 PM, one reliable information was received by O/C, Jorhat PS from reliable source that some amount of Narcotic drugs and Psychotropic Substances hiding by two individuals namely, Sri Munmun Tanti@Gopal, S/O- Sri Badal Tanti, R/o Srimantapur, Garhmur, PS & Dist- Jorhat, Assam and Ramesh Basfor@ Posa, S/o Late Moina Basfor, R/o- Srimantapur, PS &Dist-Jorhut, Assam in their house and running illegal narcotic business at Srimantapur Gaon area, Garhmur. In this regard Jorhat PS GDE No. 54, Dated 06.12.2025 was made. After getting authorization to search and seize the consignments from Shri Karnab Patowary, Dy.SP (HQ), Jorhat, SI Sankar Sajya Das of Jorhat P.S. along with OC, Jorhat P.S. and WLNK Nabalakhi Pegu, ABC Ritupon Thengal, ABC Priyatom Gogoi with NDPS investigation kit, i.e. Drugs detection kit, weighing machine, metal seal, plastic pouchs, paper envelopes, Laa(wax) and other relevant documents etc. proceeded towards Srimantapur Gaon area, Garhmur. During search, on being found the suspected persons namely, Sri Munmun Tanti @Gopal, S/o-Sri Badal Tanti, R/o -Srimantapur, Garhmur, PS & Dist-Jorbat, Assam and Ramesh Basfor @Posa. S/o-Lt. Moina Basfor, R/o-Srimantapur PS & Dist- Jorhat, Assam, the enquiry officer SI Sankar Sajya Das searched their body after observing the formalities of NDPS Act in the presence of independent witnesses and found nothing from their body. After that, the enquiry officer along with accompanied Page No.# 3/4 police party conducted house search in the house of Ramesh Basfor @Posa, S/o-Lt. Moina Basfor, R/o-Srimantapur, PS & Dist-Jorhat, Assam in presence of independent local witnesses after observing all the formalities as per NDPS Act and recovered 10.02 grams of suspected heroin. 4. It appears that the petitioner No. 1, who is the son in law of the petitioner No. 2, was found in the house of petitioner No. 2, when the search was made. It also appears that nothing was recovered from the body search of the petitioner No.1 and the recovery was made from the house of the petitioner No. 2. It also appears from the record that the petitioner No. 1 lived separately from the petitioner No. 2 and therefore, prima facie it appears that the recovery was not made from the possession of the petitioner No. 1 but that of the petitioner No. 2. 5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has objected to the prayer for bail as the charge sheet has already been submitted. 6. Having regard to the above, the prayer for bail in respect of the petitioner No. 1 is allowed. However, the prayer for bail in respect of the petitioner No. 2 is rejected at this stage. 7. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner No. 1, namely, Sri Munmun Tanti @Gopal, shall be released on bail of Rs. 50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the learned Elaka Magistrate in connection with the aforesaid case. Page No.# 4/4 8. It is further provided that the petitioner No. 1 shall regularly participate in the trial if one commences against him and shall not try to influence the witnesses in any manner or hamper or tamper with the evidence. 9. The Bail Application stands disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant