Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 63197 (MAD)

Mahaveer Chand Bohra v. The Secretary to government

WP/1128/2026 · 2026-01-20

G Arul Murugan

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.1128 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 20.01.2026 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.ARUL MURUGAN W.P.No.1128 of 2026 Mahaveer Chand Bohra Door No.40/24, Harleys Lane, kilpauk, Chennai 600 010 Petitioner Vs 1.The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009 2.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003 3.The Executive Engineer Zone 8, Greater Chennai Corporation, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer Division -23, Greater Chennai Corporation, Temple Street, Chennai 600 010 Respondents ______________ p. 2 W.P.No.1128 of 2026 PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 2 to 4 to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 13.07.2025 (de- seal) remove the lock and seal put up by the respondents 2 to 4 with regard to the petitioner’s building property located at R.S.No.3140/2015, Sub Division No.49, Block No.53, Division No.71, Door No.40/24, Harleys Lane, Kilpauk, Chennai 600 010 so as to enable the petitioner to carry out the rectifications and to restore the building as per the prevailing Planning Rules within a period of one year. For Petitioner: Mr. Sathish Parasaran Senior Counsel for Dr.D.Sridevi For Respondent(s):Mr. K.Karthik Jagannath Government Advocate for R1 Mrs. Aswini Devi.K Standing Counsel for R2 to R4 ORDER (Order of the Court was made by the Hon'ble Chief Justice) Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner would submit that though the petitioner has submitted an application seeking time to carry out necessary rectifications, the application has not been considered till date. ______________ p. 3 W.P.No.1128 of 2026 3. Learned State counsel appearing for the first respondent submits that any pending application for further extension of time to carry out rectifications shall be considered and appropriate decision thereon shall be taken within two weeks. 4. Placing on record the said statement, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA, CJ) (G.ARUL MURUGAN,J) 20.01.2026 Index : Yes/No Neutral Citation : Yes/No bbr ______________ p. 4 W.P.No.1128 of 2026 To: 1.The Secretary to Government Government of Tamil Nadu, Housing and Urban Development, Secretariat, Chennai 600 009 2.The Commissioner Greater Chennai Corporation, Rippon Building, Chennai 600 003 3.The Executive Engineer Zone 8, Greater Chennai Corporation, Pulla Avenue, Shenoy Nagar, Chennai 600 030 4.The Assistant Executive Engineer Division -23, Greater Chennai Corporation, Temple Street, Chennai 600 010 ______________ p. 5 W.P.No.1128 of 2026 THE HON'BLE CHIEF JUSTICE AND G.ARUL MURUGAN,J. bbr W.P.No.1128 of 2026 20.01.2026 ______________