[2026:RJ-JP:10668] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3794/2026 Aman Meena S/o Baindiram Meena, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Khaimari Jakha Padampura Police Station Sarmathpura, District Dholpur (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through P.P. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3795/2026 Sachin Meena Son Of Shyamveer Meena, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Sunkai, Police Station Aangai, District Dholpur (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Jhunjhunu) ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3796/2026 Neeraj Meena S/o Shri Prakash Meena, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Gunesra, Police Station Sadar, District Karauli Presently Resident Of 24 Sundaram Colony, In Front Of Airport Sanganer, Police Station Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.). (The Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Jhunjhunu). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Dr. Arpan Kumar Sharma & Ms. Anu Joshi for Mr. O.P. Jhajharia Mr. Aditya Khandelwal Mr. Rahul Sharma & Mr. Aamir Khan For State For Complainant(s) : : Mr. Manvendra Singh Choudhary, PP Mr. Vikash Kumar Jakhar [2026:RJ-JP:10668] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-3794/2026] HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SANGEETA SHARMA Order 13/03/2026 1. These bail applications have been filed on behalf of the accused-petitioners under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. in connection with FIR No. 04/2026 registered at Police Station Cyber Police Station(Jhunjhunu) District Jhunjhunu, for the offence(s) under Sections 316(2), 318(4), 319(2) and 61(2) of BNS and Section 66-D of IT Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel also contends that the petitioners are in custody since 13.02.2026 and recovery has already been effected. He further submits that the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate. There is no criminal antecedent against the petitioners. He submits that a compromise has been arrived between the parties so no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in custody and therefore, prays that the petitioner may be granted the benefit of bail under Section 483 of BNSS. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners hereinabove. Learned counsel for the complainant submits that a compromise has been arrived between the parties and no dispute is left. 4. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are in custody since 13.02.2026; there is no criminal antecedent registered against the [2026:RJ-JP:10668] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-3794/2026] petitioners; the alleged offences are triable by Magistrate and a compromise has been arrived between the parties. Hence, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits/demerits of the case deems it just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 5. Therefore, these bail applications under Section 483 BNSS are accordingly, allowed and the accused-petitioners namely Aman Meena S/o Baindiram Meena, Sachin Meena S/o Shyamveer Meena & Neeraj Meena S/o Shri Prakash Meena are ordered to be released on bail, provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs. 50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the trial Court, with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 6. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax, for necessary compliance. (SANGEETA SHARMA),J Heena/75-77