Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11121] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.90 of 2026
------ Saurabh Singh, aged about 28 years, son of Rajesh Kumar Singh, resident of Kalpanapuri Road No.6, P.O. Adityapur, P.S. Adityapur, District- Seraikela-Kharsawan, Jharkhand
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Indrajit Sinha, Advocate
Mr. Akhouri Awinash Kumar, Advocate
Ms. Rashika Bajaj, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Achinto Sen, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.06 Dated-17-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.206 of 2024 (s) registered for the offences punishable under Section 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act,
1959.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons, committed murder of the son of the informant namely Vivek Kumar Singh. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of the co-accused person. It is next submitted that charge sheet has already been submitted against the petitioner. It is next submitted that except confessional statement, there is no material in the record to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is next submitted that no witness has been examined as yet, by the trial court. It is then submitted that the co-accused, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.07.2025 passed in B.A. No.5526 of 2025. It is then submitted that the petitioner
undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 26.11.2025 as has been mentioned in para-09 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Seraikella in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No.206 of 2024 (s) with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case, furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated-17.04.2026-Animesh/