HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 27385 of 2026 Court No. - 37 HON'BLE CHANDRA KUMAR RAI, J. 1. Restoration order dated 14.7.2026 passed by Collector Mau is taken on record. 2. Heard Mr. Satyam Kumar Verma, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Gaurav Bishan, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Shashi Kant Kushwaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed for the following relief:- "a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent No. 2, the Collector/District Magistrate, Mau, to decide the Restoration/Recall Application No. 1236 of 2025 filed in Revenue Case No. 00095 of 2021, as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months or within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper. b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Respondent No. 2, the Collector/District Magistrate, Mau, to conclude and decide Revenue Case No. 00095 of 2021 (arising out of the proceedings under Section 30(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Revenue Code, 2006) relating to Ansh Nirdharan/Physical Demarcation of Gata No. 27- Mi, Mauza Imliya, Tehsil Maunath Bhanjan, District Mau, after affording due opportunity of hearing to all concerned parties, without granting unnecessary adjournments within such time as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gaurav Bishan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Shri Avishek Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) 4. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that after filing of instant petition, pending restoration application filed by private respondents has been allowed and proceeding under Section 30 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 has been restored to its original number, as such, petitioner is not pressing the prayer no."a" rather he is pressing the prayer no."b". He submitted that proceeding under Section 30 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 was initiated in the year 2020, as such, appropriate direction be issued for expeditious disposal of aforementioned proceeding. He further placed the order sheet of the pending proceeding in order to demonstrate that matter is not proceeding expeditiously. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the issue, the present petition stands disposed of finally with a direction to respondent No.2, Collector Mau to consider and decide the aforementioned proceeding under Section 30 (2) of U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of certified copy of this order after giving opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned and without granting unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties. September 11, 2026 Vandana Y. WRIC No. 27385 of 2026 2 (Chandra Kumar Rai,J.) Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad