HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32436 of 2026 Court No. - 68 (Sr. No.46 out of 76) HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Qamar Ali Jafri, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Arun Kumar Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.172 of 2026, under Sections 191(2), 115(2), 121(1), 127(2), 324(4), 61(2), 191(3), 326(g), 190, 125, 132, 195(2), 285 B.N.S., 2023, Section 7 Criminal Law (Amendment) Act, 1932 and Sections 3, 4 of Prevention of Damage to Public Property Act, 1984, Police Station Phase I, District Gautam Buddha Nagar, during the pendency of trial. 4. In all, eleven FIRs were instituted against the applicant at a go. 5. After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration that similarly placed co-accused person Manisha Alias Manisha Chauhan has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 08.09.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.31458 of 2026, and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, prima facie the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed on the ground of parity. 6. Let the applicant- Himanshu Thakur, be released on bail in the aforementioned case crime on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned, subject to verification of sureties, with the conditions that he shall not tamper with evidence or intimidate witnesses and shall appear before the trial court as required. 7. Breach of any condition shall entail cancellation of bail. The observations herein shall not affect the trial on merits. (Krishan Pahal,J.) September 11, 2026 (Ravi Kant) Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Qamar Ali Jafri Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Himanshu Thakur .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- RAVI KANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad