Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6305 (RAJ)

BARKAT S/O SHRI KURSID v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2896/2026 · 2026-02-19

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:7869] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. 2nd Bail Application No. 2896/2026 Barkat S/o Shri Kursid, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Ranveer Bas, Police Station Nauganva, District Alwar (Rajasthan) (At Present Confined In Central Jail Alwar, District Alwar). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Suresh Kumar For Respondent(s) : Mr. A.K. Gupta, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 19/02/2026 1. This second bail application has been filed by the petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in connection with FIR No.418/2025 registered at Police Station Nouganwa, District Alwar for the offence punishable u/S 318(4), 319(2), 336(3), 340(2), 240, 61(2) BNS and Section 66-D of the IT Act. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and also perused the case diary. 3. Learned counsel for the accused petitioner submits that the accused petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that after conclusion of the investigation, the police has submitted charge-sheet in the matter. He further submits that no other criminal case is pending against the accused [2026:RJ-JP:7869] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2896/2026] petitioner. He also submits that the accused petitioner is in custody since 10.12.2025 and he is no more required for any kind of interrogation and recovery and the trial will take its own time, therefore the accused petitioner may be released on bail. 4. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the accused petitioner and so also the fact that no other criminal case is pending against the accused petitioner and he is in custody since 10.12.2025, this Court, without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused petitioner on bail. 5. Accordingly, this second bail application is allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided that he furnishes a personal bonds in the sum of Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac Only)(each), together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) (each) to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court or any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Gaurav Srivastava /6